Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  53 / 85 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 85 Next Page
Page Background

53

79. See Ronald J. Clarke and Phillip V. Tobias,

Sterkfontein Member 2 Foot

Bones of the Oldest South African Hominid,

Science, 269 (July 28, 1995): 521

24.

80. Peter Andrews,

Ecological Apes and Ancestors,

Nature, 376 (August 17,

1995): 555

56.

81. Oxnard,

The place of the australopithecines in human evolution: grounds

for doubt?,

389

95.

82. Yoel Rak, Avishag Ginzburg, and Eli Geffen,

Gorilla-like anatomy on

Australopithecus afarensis mandibles suggests Au. afarensis link to robust

australopiths,

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 104 (April

17, 2007): 6568

72.

83. Donald C. Johanson, C. Owen Lovejoy, William H. Kimbel, Tim D. White,

Steven C. Ward, Michael E. Bush, Bruce M. Latimer, and Yves Coppens,

Morphology of

the Pliocene Partial Hominid Skeleton (A.L. 288-1). From the Hadar Formation,

Ethiopia,

American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 57 (1982): 403

51.

84. Fran

ç

ois Marchal,

A New Morphometric Analysis of the Hominid Pelvic

Bone,

Journal of Human Evolution, 38 (March, 2000): 347

65.

85. M. Maurice Abitbol,

Lateral view of Australopithecus afarensis: primitive

aspects of bipedal positional behavior in the earliest hominids,

Journal of Human

Evolution, 28 (March, 1995): 211

29 (internal citations removed).

86. Leslie Aiello quoted in Leakey and Lewin, Origins Reconsidered: In Search

of What Makes Us Human, 196. See also Bernard Wood and Mark Collard,

The Human

Genus,

Science, 284 (April 2, 1999): 65

71.

87. F. Spoor, M. G. Leakey, P. N. Gathogo, F. H. Brown, S. C. Ant

ó

n, I.

McDougall, C. Kiarie, F. K. Manthi, and L. N. Leakey,

Implications of new early

Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, Kenya,

Nature, 448 (August 9,

2007): 688

91.

88. Ian Tattersall,

The Many Faces of Homo habilis,

Evolutionary

Anthropology, 1 (1992): 33

37.

89. Ian Tattersall and Jeffrey H. Schwartz,

Evolution of the Genus Homo,

Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37 (2009): 67

92.

Paleoanthropologists Daniel E. Lieberman, David R. Pilbeam, and Richard W. Wrangham

likewise co-write that

fossils attributed to H. habilis are poorly associated with

inadequate and fragmentary postcrania.

Daniel E. Lieberman, David R. Pilbeam, and

Richard W. Wrangham,

The Transition from Australopithecus to Homo,

in Transitions

in Prehistory: Essays in Honor of Ofer Bar-Yosef, eds. John J. Shea and Daniel E.

Lieberman (Cambridge: Oxbow Books, 2009), 1. See also Ann Gibbons,

Who Was Homo

habilis

And Was It Really Homo?,

Science, 332 (June 17, 2011): 1370

71

(

researchers labeled a number of diverse, fragmentary fossils from East Africa and

SouthAfrica

H. habilis,

making the taxon a

grab bag

a Homo waste bin,

says

paleoanthropologist Chris Ruff of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore,

Maryland

).