ScienceAndHumanOrigins-T

19 / 91

19
Illustration: Annbale Caracci, “ Studio di nudo maschile,” public
domain, reprinted from Wikimedia Commons.
註釋:
1. See, for example, Barbara Bradley Hagerty, “Evangelicals Question the
Existence of Adam and Eve,” National Public Radio, August 9, 2011, accessed March 6,
2012, and Richard N. Ostling,“The Search for the Historical Adam,” Christianity Today,
June 2011, accessed March 6, 2012.
2. The tree was recently redrawn—and the terminology changed—to accommodate
sequence data that (mostly) places us in our own group with chimps. Previously the
same group was called the hominids, but that term now covers all great apes and us.
Some articles still use the older terminology. See
3. For more details on the subject, see chapter 3 on “ Human Origins and the
Fossil Record” by Casey Luskin later in this volume.
4. Ernst Mayr, What Makes Biology Unique? (New York: Cambridge University Press,
2004), 198.
5. For a discussion of one kind of rearrangement that is often used as evidence
for common descent, see chapter 4 by Casey Luskin on “Francis Collins, Junk DNA, and
Chromosomal Fusion.”
6. T. C. Wood, “ The chimpanzee genome and the problem of biological similarity,”
Occas Papers of the BSG 7 (2006): 1–18; G. Glazko, et. al., “Eighty percent of
proteins are different between humans and chimpanzees,” Gene 346 (2005): 215–219; J.
Cohen, “Relative differences: The myth of 1%, ” Science 316 (2007): 1836.
7. A. K. Gauger and D. D. Axe, “ The evolutionary accessibility of new enzyme
functions: A case study from the biotin pathway,” BIO-Complexity 2, no. 1 (2011): 1–
17.
8. Ibid.